Current Methods for Recurrent Events Data With Dependent Termination
存在依赖性终止时复发事件数据的现有分析方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦复发事件与依赖性终止的生存分析,未直接涉及所列计量领域细分。
存在依赖性终止时复发事件数据的现有分析方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
There has been a recent surge of interest in modeling and methods for analyzing recurrent events data with risk of termination dependent on the history of the recurrent events. To aid the future users in understanding the implications of modeling assumptions and modeling properties, we review the state of the art statistical methods and present novel theoretical properties, identifiability results and practical consequences of key modeling assumptions of several fully specified stochastic models. After introducing stochastic models with noninformative termination process, we focus on a class of models which allows both negative and positive association between the risk of termination and the rate of recurrent events via a frailty variable. We also discuss the relationship as well as the major differences between these models in terms of their motivations and physical interpretations. We discuss associated Bayesian methods based on Markov chain Monte Carlo tools, and novel model diagnostic tools to perform inference based on fully specified models. We demonstrate the usefulness of current methodology through an analysis of a data set from a clinical trial. In conclusion, we explore possible future extensions and limitations of the methodology.