跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接讨论工具变量的因果识别、依从者平均因果效应及识别假设敏感性,明确属于因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Joshua D. Angrist
Guido W. Imbens
Donald B. Rubin

使用工具变量识别因果效应

研究问题
二元处理分配可忽略但存在不完全依从时,工具变量估计对象何时能够解释为某一群体的平均因果效应?
方法与思路
作者将工具变量估计对象嵌入 Rubin 因果模型,区分处理分配与实际接受处理,并考察关键假设偏离的敏感性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在若干假设下,工具变量估计对象是依从者的平均因果效应;缺少这些假设时,仅为意向处理因果效应之比。
阅读关注点
阅读时应核对依从者的定义、获得平均因果解释所需的具体假设,以及征兵抽签工具变量应用中的敏感性分析。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 摘要,稿件版本未注明;关键假设和实证结果未展开,不能断言具体应用已满足全部识别条件。

原文摘要

We outline a framework for causal inference in settings where assignment to a binary treatment is ignorable, but compliance with the assignment is not perfect so that the receipt of treatment is nonignorable. To address the problems associated with comparing subjects by the ignorable assignment—an “intention-to-treat analysis”—we make use of instrumental variables, which have long been used by economists in the context of regression models with constant treatment effects. We show that the instrumental variables (IV) estimand can be embedded within the Rubin Causal Model (RCM) and that under some simple and easily interpretable assumptions, the IV estimand is the average causal effect for a subgroup of units, the compliers. Without these assumptions, the IV estimand is simply the ratio of intention-to-treat causal estimands with no interpretation as an average causal effect. The advantages of embedding the IV approach in the RCM are that it clarifies the nature of critical assumptions needed for a causal interpretation, and moreover allows us to consider sensitivity of the results to deviations from key assumptions in a straightforward manner. We apply our analysis to estimate the effect of veteran status in the Vietnam era on mortality, using the lottery number that assigned priority for the draft as an instrument, and we use our results to investigate the sensitivity of the conclusions to critical assumptions.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文