跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论复合原假设下的通用检验校准理论,未提供归入给定应用细分领域的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
James M. Robins
Aad van der Vaart
ValéRie Ventura

复合原假设模型中 p 值的渐近分布

研究问题
原假设含未知干扰参数时,不同消除参数的方法所得 p 值为何不再均匀分布,其渐近校准与保守程度如何比较?
方法与思路
作者分析后验预测、代入、部分后验预测和条件预测等 p 值在原假设下的渐近分布,并讨论校正保守 p 值的方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称统计量渐近均值依赖干扰参数时,后验预测与代入 p 值偏保守,前者更明显;部分后验及条件预测 p 值渐近均匀。
阅读关注点
应核对各类 p 值的定义、均值依赖参数这一条件的作用,以及差异度量 p 值的反例和恢复渐近均匀性的修改方法。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要解读。摘要未给出完整正则条件与有限样本表现,不能把特定条件下的校准结论视为普遍结论。

原文摘要

We investigate the compatibility of a null model H 0 with the data by calculating a p value; that is, the probability, under H 0, that a given test statistic T exceeds its observed value. When the null model consists of a single distribution, the p value is readily obtained, and it has a uniform distribution under H 0. On the other hand, when the null model depends on an unknown nuisance parameter θ one must somehow get rid of θ, (e.g., by estimating it) to calculate a p value. Various proposals have been suggested to “remove” θ, each yielding a different candidate p value. But unlike the simple case, these p values typically are not uniformly distributed under the null model. In this article we investigate their asymptotic distribution under H 0. We show that when the asymptotic mean of the test statistic T depends on θ, the posterior predictive p value of Guttman and Rubin, and the plug-in p value are conservative (i.e., their asymptotic distributions are more concentrated around 1/2 than a uniform), with the posterior predictive p value being the more conservative. In contrast, the partial posterior predictive and conditional predictive p values of Bayarri and Berger are asymptotically uniform. Furthermore, we show that the discrepancy p value of Meng and Gelman and colleagues can be conservative, even when the discrepancy measure has mean 0 under the null model. We also describe ways to modify the conservative p values to make their distributions asymptotically uniform.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文