跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论长度偏倚生存抽样与似然推断,未明确涉及所列经济计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

失效时间长度偏倚抽样引起的协变量偏倚

研究问题
横截面抽样偏向长期存活者时,协变量分布也可能改变;对协变量作条件分析是否导致回归系数偏倚,联合分析能否提高效率?
方法与思路
作者构建协变量与失效时间的联合似然,研究相应最大似然估计量的大样本性质,并与条件似然估计进行比较。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,联合似然估计比条件估计更有效率,同时两者渐近相等;作者用加拿大健康与老龄研究中的痴呆生存数据作说明。
阅读关注点
应核对长度偏倚抽样如何进入联合似然、条件分析的有效性条件,以及“渐近相等”和“效率提高”分别采用何种定义。
阅读边界
仅据OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明。摘要未解释两类估计量渐近相等与效率差异的关系,也未完整回答偏倚问题,需查全文。

原文摘要

Although many authors have proposed different approaches to the analysis of length-biased survival data, a number of issues have not been fully addressed. The most important among these issues is perhaps that regarding inclusion of covariates into the analysis of length-biased lifetime data collected through cross-sectional sampling of a population. One aspect of this problem, which appears to have been neglected in the literature, concerns the effect of length bias on the sampling distribution of the covariates. In most regression analyses, it is conventional to condition on the observed covariate values; however, certain covariate values could be preferentially selected into the sample, being linked to the long-term survivors, who themselves are favored by the sampling mechanism. This observation raises two questions: (1) Does the conditional analysis of covariates lead to biased estimators of regression coefficients?; and (2) does inference through the joint l likelihood of covariates and failure times yield more efficient estimators of the regression parameters? We present a joint likelihood approach and study the large-sample behavior of the resulting maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs). We find that these MLEs are more efficient than their conditional counterparts even though the two MLEs are asymptotically equal. Our results are illustrated using data on survival with dementia, collected as part of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文