跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确涉及未测混杂、近端因果识别和最优个体化治疗规则的学习。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Zhengling Qi
Rui Miao
Xiaoke Zhang

未测混杂下个体化治疗规则的近端学习

研究问题
在观察研究存在未测混杂时,如何利用代理变量识别并学习个体化治疗规则,同时权衡不可检验假设与决策价值提升?
方法与思路
作者利用两类代理变量,为不同治疗规则类别建立近端因果识别结果,再提出基于分类的学习方法寻找受限类别内的最优规则。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,研究给出多类规则的识别与理论性质,展示假设风险和价值函数改善之间的权衡,并以模拟及真实数据应用说明方法。
阅读关注点
应核对两类代理变量的角色、识别条件与规则可使用的信息,以及受限类别内最优和整体最优之间的差别。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;代理变量并不自动消除未测混杂,摘要未列明相关识别假设。

原文摘要

Data-driven individualized decision making has recently received increasing research interest. However, most existing methods rely on the assumption of no unmeasured confounding, which cannot be ensured in practice especially in observational studies. Motivated by the recently proposed proximal causal inference, we develop several proximal learning methods to estimate optimal individualized treatment regimes (ITRs) in the presence of unmeasured confounding. Explicitly, in terms of two types of proxy variables, we are able to establish several identification results for different classes of ITRs respectively, exhibiting the tradeoff between the risk of making untestable assumptions and the potential improvement of the value function in decision making. Based on these identification results, we propose several classification-based approaches to finding a variety of restricted in-class optimal ITRs and establish their theoretical properties. The appealing numerical performance of our proposed methods is demonstrated via extensive simulation experiments and a real data application. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组