跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究医学二元结局预测,未涉及个体选择行为或所列宏观、金融预测方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Stanley Lemeshow
Daniel Teres
Jill Spitz Avrunin
Harris Pastides

重症监护病房患者结局的预测

研究问题
能否利用进入 ICU 时即可获得的临床变量建立住院死亡概率模型,并在新患者队列中检验其校准和分类表现?
方法与思路
作者以737名 ICU 患者开发多变量 logistic 回归模型,再用1997名连续入组患者验证,并与专家赋权模型比较。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称统计模型在验证队列中拟合良好,各模型分类指标相近,但拟合检验提示其死亡概率更贴合观测结果。
阅读关注点
应核对患者来源、变量筛选与缺失处理、分类阈值,以及拟合检验、校准表现和分类能力分别支持哪些结论。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;跨医院适用性与验证细节未说明,拟合检验结果不能单独确立全面预测优势。

原文摘要

Statisticians are being asked with increasing frequency to develop models for occurrences in medical environments. Until recently, only subjective models were available to predict mortality for patients in an intensive care unit (ICU). These models were based on variables and associated weights determined by panels of medical “experts.” This article shows how multiple logistic regression (MLR) can be used to develop an objective model for prediction of hospital mortality among ICU patients. An MLR model to be applied when a patient is admitted to the ICU was developed on 737 ICU patients. The final model is based on the following variables: presence of coma or deep stupor at admission, emergency admission, cancer part of present problem, probable infection, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to admission, age, and systolic blood pressure at admission. To validate this model, a new cohort of 1,997 consecutive ICU patients was entered into the study. Information was collected for the variables in the MLR model and, in addition, the variables necessary to evaluate the “subjective” models. The admission mortality prediction model [MPM0(CPR)] was validated on this new cohort of patients using goodness-of-fit tests. It was found that this model had excellent fit (p = .74). In addition, the overall correct classification for this model in the validation data set was 86.1%. The predictive values for dying and surviving, sensitivity, and specificity were 71.3%, 88.5%, 50.2%, and 95.0%, respectively. The direct comparison of MPM0(CPR) and the subjective systems based on the new cohort demonstrated that although all methods considered demonstrated comparable sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and total correct classification rates, goodness-of-fit tests suggest that the probabilities of hospital mortality as produced by the statistical model best fit the observed mortality experience. One of the commonly used subjective models tended to overestimate the probabilities of hospital mortality, and the other tended to underestimate these probabilities. To be useful, a severity index should be based on simple calculations using readily available data, and be independent of medical treatment in the ICU. Given the widespread availability of microcomputers, the newly developed statistical model seems to satisfy these criteria.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文