跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要中的风险是患者不良事件风险,研究属于医学缺失数据预测,并非金融风险或收益预测。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Curtis B. Storlie
Terry M. Therneau
Rickey E. Carter
Nicholas Chia
John R. Bergquist

患者预警系统中缺失数据下的预测与推断

研究问题
当患者预警系统的大量预测变量缺失时,如何预测不良事件并量化插补带来的不确定性,以及补测信息的潜在价值?
方法与思路
作者以无限正态混合灵活建模预测变量,借助潜变量处理离散变量,并让缺失指示参与缺失变量分布的建模。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称贝叶斯方法可传播插补不确定性、处理某些非随机缺失情形,并提供预测分布;患者预警应用展示了预测能力。
阅读关注点
应核对哪些非随机缺失机制可被处理、模型识别与先验设定,以及风险校准、外部验证和补测降低不确定性的计算方法。
阅读边界
依据稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要,不能判断刊本变化;摘要未给出预测性能数值,也未说明非随机缺失处理的完整条件。

原文摘要

We describe the Bedside Patient Rescue (BPR) project, the goal of which is risk prediction of adverse events for non-intensive care unit patients using ∼100 variables (vitals, lab results, assessments, etc.). There are several missing predictor values for most patients, which in the health sciences is the norm, rather than the exception. A Bayesian approach is presented that addresses many of the shortcomings to standard approaches to missing predictors: (i) treatment of the uncertainty due to imputation is straight-forward in the Bayesian paradigm, (ii) the predictor distribution is flexibly modeled as an infinite normal mixture with latent variables to explicitly account for discrete predictors (i.e., as in multivariate probit regression models), and (iii) certain missing not at random situations can be handled effectively by allowing the indicator of missingness into the predictor distribution only to inform the distribution of the missing variables. The proposed approach also has the benefit of providing a distribution for the prediction, including the uncertainty inherent in the imputation. Therefore, we can ask questions such as: is it possible this individual is at high risk but we are missing too much information to know for sure? How much would we reduce the uncertainty in our risk prediction by obtaining a particular missing value? This approach is applied to the BPR problem resulting in excellent predictive capability to identify deteriorating patients. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文