跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将共同尺度插补用于出生体重的分位数回归,对分位数分析有直接应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Lane F. Burgette
Jerome P. Reiter

研究中途更换测量方法所致缺失数据的非参数贝叶斯多重插补

研究问题
研究中途更换测量尺度且没有同一样本的双尺度校准数据时,如何统一测量并避免直接混用不同尺度造成的分析偏差?
方法与思路
作者依赖测量尺度大致保持样本排序的假设,提出秩置换插补,以及两种利用协变量的依赖狄利克雷过程混合插补方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,三种策略可生成共同尺度上的合理测量值,并通过模拟给出适用指导;应用中估计出生体重与污染物的分位数回归。
阅读关注点
应核对秩保持假设与实验室切换机制、协变量条件化方式、插补不确定性的传递,以及尺度转换对分位数回归的影响。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;无联合测量时尺度关联依赖所述假设,摘要未说明其可检验性及具体表现,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Investigators often change how variables are measured during the middle of data-collection, for example, in hopes of obtaining greater accuracy or reducing costs. The resulting data comprise sets of observations measured on two (or more) different scales, which complicates interpretation and can create bias in analyses that rely directly on the differentially measured variables. We develop approaches based on multiple imputation for handling mid-study changes in measurement for settings without calibration data, that is, no subjects are measured on both (all) scales. This setting creates a seemingly insurmountable problem for multiple imputation: since the measurements never appear jointly, there is no information in the data about their association. We resolve the problem by making an often scientifically reasonable assumption that each measurement regime accurately ranks the samples but on differing scales, so that, for example, an individual at the qth percentile on one scale should be at about the qth percentile on the other scale. We use rank-preservation assumptions to develop three imputation strategies that flexibly transform measurements made in one scale to measurements made in another: a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-free approach based on permuting ranks of measurements, and two approaches based on dependent Dirichlet process (DDP) mixture models for imputing values conditional on covariates. We use simulations to illustrate conditions under which each strategy performs well, and present guidance on when to apply each. We apply these methods to a study of birth outcomes in which investigators collected mothers’ blood samples to measure levels of environmental contaminants. Midway through data ascertainment, the study switched from one analytical lab to another. The distributions of blood lead levels differ greatly across the two labs, suggesting that the labs report measurements according to different scales. We use nonparametric Bayesian imputation models to obtain sets of plausible measurements on a common scale, and estimate quantile regressions of birth weight on various environmental contaminants.

笔记与分组