Approximate likelihood ratios for general estimating functions
一般估计函数的近似似然比AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:估计函数与近似似然比属于通用推断理论,聚类数据本身不足以判定为面板或因果研究。
一般估计函数的近似似然比AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The method of estimating functions (Godambe, 1991) is commonly used when one desires to conduct inference about some parameters of interest but the full distribution of the observations is unknown. However, this approach may have limited utility, due to multiple roots for the estimating function, a poorly behaved Wald test, or lack of a goodness-of-fit test. This paper presents approximate likelihood ratios that can be used along with estimating functions when any of these three problems occurs. We show that the approximate likelihood ratio provides correct large sample inference under very general circumstances, including clustered data and misspecified weights in the estimating function. Two methods of constructing the approximate likelihood ratio, one based on the quasi-likelihood approach and the other based on the linear projection approach, are compared and shown to be closely related. In particular we show that quasi-likelihood is the limit of the projection approach. We illustrate the technique with two applications.