跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以广义拟合优度和生存分析为核心,未提供与给定经济计量细分方向直接对应的依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Gang Li
Hani Doss

广义 Pearson–Fisher 卡方拟合优度检验及生命历程数据应用

研究问题
当分布由具有高斯过程极限的非参数估计量估计时,如何推广 Pearson–Fisher 检验,并允许数据决定分组区间?
方法与思路
作者以正定二次型衡量估计分组概率与参数模型概率的距离,通过最小距离估计参数,再构造卡方型检验统计量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,论文建立相应渐近卡方分布,涵盖右删失和左截断模型,指出已有文献错误,并用于 AIDS 潜伏期模型选择。
阅读关注点
应核对高斯过程与分组条件、二次型及参数估计如何保证自由度结论,以及删失、截断应用和模型比较的具体依据。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;正则条件、证明与应用数值未提供,拟合改善不等于模型正确,也不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Suppose that $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ are i.i.d. $\sim F$, and we wish to test the null hypothesis that $F$ is a member of the parametric family $\mathscr{F} = \{F_\theta(x); \theta \in \Theta\}$ where $\Theta \subset \mathbb{R}^q$. The classical Pearson-Fisher chi-square test involves partitioning the real axis into $k$ cells $I_1,\ldots, I_k$ and forming the chi-square statistic $X^2 = \sum^k_{i = 1}(O_i - nF_{\hat{\theta}}(I_i))^2/nF_{\hat{\theta}}(I_i)$, where $O_i$ is the number of observations falling into cell $i$ and $\hat{\theta}$ is the value of $\theta$ minimizing $\sum^k_{i = 1}(O_i - nF_\theta(I_i))^2/nF_\theta(I_i)$. We obtain a generalization of this test to any situation for which there is available a nonparametric estimator $\hat{F}$ of $F$ for which $n^{1/2}(\hat{F} - F) \rightarrow_d W$, where $W$ is a continuous zero mean Gaussian process satisfying a mild regularity condition. We allow the cells to be data dependent. Essentially, we estimate $\theta$ by the value $\hat{\theta}$ that minimizes a "distance" between the vectors $(\hat{F}(I_1),\ldots,\hat{F}(I_k))$ and $(F_\theta(I_1),\ldots, F_\theta(I_k))$, where distance is measured through an arbitrary positive definite quadratic form, and then form a chi-square type test statistic based on the difference between $(\hat{F}(I_1),\ldots,\hat{F}(I_k))$ and $(F_{\hat{\theta}}(I_1),\ldots, F_{\hat{\theta}}(I_k))$. We prove that this test statistic has asymptotically a chi-square distribution with $k - q - 1$ degrees of freedom, and point out some errors in the literature on chi-square tests in survival analysis. Our procedure is very general and applies to a number of well-known models in survival analysis, such as right censoring and left truncation. We apply our method to deal with questions of model selection in the problem of estimating the distribution of the length of the incubation period of the AIDS virus using the CDC's data on blood-transfusion related AIDS. Our analysis suggests some models that seem to fit better than those used in the literature.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文