跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用选择后推断及遗传关联应用,关联发现未被表述为因果识别,缺乏所列领域的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ruth Heller
Amit Meir

聚合关联检验后的选择后估计与检验

研究问题
先用聚合关联检验筛选信号后,如何对其中单个假设进行有效检验与区间估计,避免筛选造成的推断失真?
方法与思路
作者对选择事件进行条件化,刻画单个统计量的选择后分布,并提出检验、最大似然计算算法及采用切换机制的区间。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,单个假设的检验在正态模型下精确、其他情形下有渐近依据,并通过模拟和心脏研究数据展示应用。
阅读关注点
应核对选择事件的完整定义、正态模型的精确性条件、非正态渐近要求,以及区间切换机制如何支持覆盖率保证。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断具体功效、覆盖率或计算成本;精确性结论限于摘要指定的正态模型。

原文摘要

Summary The practice of pooling several individual test statistics to form aggregate tests is common in many statistical applications where individual tests may be underpowered. Although selection by aggregate tests can serve to increase power, the selection process invalidates inference based on the individual test statistics, making it difficult to identify those that drive the signal in follow-up inference. Here, we develop a general approach for valid inference following selection by aggregate testing. We present novel powerful post-selection tests for the individual null hypotheses which are exact for the normal model and asymptotically justified otherwise. Our approach relies on the ability to characterize the distribution of the individual test statistics after conditioning on the event of selection. We provide efficient algorithms for computation of the post-selection maximum likelihood estimates and suggest confidence intervals which rely on a novel switching regime for good coverage guarantees. We validate our methods via comprehensive simulation studies and apply them to data from the Dallas Heart Study, demonstrating that single-variant association discovery following selection by an aggregate test is indeed possible in practice.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文