Causality Learning With Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks
利用 Wasserstein 生成对抗网络学习因果结构AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以因果结构学习和有向无环图为研究对象,直接关联因果推断。
利用 Wasserstein 生成对抗网络学习因果结构AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Conventional methods for causal structure learning from data face significant challenges due to combinatorial search space. Recently, the problem has been formulated into a continuous optimization framework with an acyclicity constraint to learn Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs). Such a framework allows the utilization of deep generative models for causal structure learning to better capture the relations between data sample distributions and DAGs. However, so far no study has experimented with the use of Wasserstein distance in the context of causal structure learning. Our model named DAG-WGAN combines the Wasserstein-based adversarial loss with an acyclicity constraint in an auto-encoder architecture. It simultaneously learns causal structures while improving its data generation capability. We compare the performance of DAG-WGAN with other models that do not involve the Wasserstein metric in order to identify its contribution to causal structure learning. Our model performs better with high cardinality data according to our experiments.