跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:文本讨论通用随机效应与误差分布估计,未明确经济面板或分布效应应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Peter Hall
Qiwei Yao

低重复次数方差分量模型中的推断

研究问题
当每个群体只有少量重复观测、但群体数量较多时,能否非参数地估计相互独立的群体效应与组内误差的分布?
方法与思路
在群体效应与误差独立、各自分布跨实例不变的设定下,作者提出两种基于 Fourier 反演的方法,处理重复观测有限的问题。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,即使每个群体的重复次数仅为两次也可进行推断;数值实验中,计算量明显更高的方法表现较好。
阅读关注点
应核对两次重复观测下的识别条件、特征函数限制、反演与平滑步骤,以及分布估计一致性和计算成本之间的关系。
阅读边界
材料为版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要。独立性以外的识别及正则条件未说明,不能将两次重复下的可行性视为无条件结论。

原文摘要

In components of variance models the data are viewed as arising through a sum of two random variables, representing between- and within-group variation, respectively. The former is generally interpreted as a group effect, and the latter as error. It is assumed that these variables are stochastically independent and that the distributions of the group effect and the error do not vary from one instance to another. If each group effect can be replicated a large number of times, then standard methods can be used to estimate the distributions of both the group effect and the error. This cannot be achieved without replication, however. How feasible is distribution estimation if it is not possible to replicate prolifically? Can the distributions of random effects and errors be estimated consistently from a small number of replications of each of a large number of noisy group effects, for example, in a nonparametric setting? Often extensive replication is practically infeasible, in particular, if inherently small numbers of individuals exhibit any given group effect. Yet it is quite unclear how to conduct inference in this case. We show that inference is possible, even if the number of replications is as small as 2. Two methods are proposed, both based on Fourier inversion. One, which is substantially more computer intensive than the other, exhibits better performance in numerical experiments.

笔记与分组