跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确涉及观察性数据的加权因果效应、重叠问题与双重机器学习,支持因果推断;事件时间结局本身不属于时间序列。

反馈分类问题

Efficient estimation of weighted cumulative treatment effects by double/debiased machine learning

用双重/去偏机器学习有效估计加权累积治疗效应

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Shenbo Xu
Bang Zheng
Bowen Su
Stan Finkelstein
Roy Welsch
Kenney Ng
Ioanna Tzoulaki
Zach Shahn

用双重/去偏机器学习有效估计加权累积治疗效应

研究问题
对于事件发生时间结局,当观察性数据重叠不足且辅助模型容易错设时,如何灵活而有效地估计随限制时间变化的加权累积因果效应。
方法与思路
作者提出一类一步式交叉拟合双重/去偏机器学习估计量,允许辅助模型使用机器学习,并针对加权累积效应进行理论和模拟分析。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,估计量在正则条件下具有一致性、渐近线性并达到半参数效率界;模拟及英国基层医疗药物比较用于展示方法表现。
阅读关注点
应核对权重与限制时间如何定义目标效应、删失及重叠要求,以及辅助模型收敛条件、效率界和时间函数推断的具体形式。
阅读边界
这是arXiv预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未核实;摘要未列出正则与识别条件,加权改变目标后不能直接解释为总体平均治疗效应。

原文摘要

In empirical studies with time-to-event outcomes, investigators often leverage observational data to conduct causal inference on the effect of exposure when randomized controlled trial data is unavailable. Model misspecification and lack of overlap are common issues in observational studies, and they often lead to inconsistent and inefficient estimators of the average treatment effect. Estimators targeting overlap weighted effects have been proposed to address the challenge of poor overlap, and methods enabling flexible machine learning for nuisance models address model misspecification. However, the approaches that allow machine learning for nuisance models have not been extended to the setting of weighted average treatment effects for time-to-event outcomes when there is poor overlap. In this work, we propose a class of one-step cross-fitted double/debiased machine learning estimators for the weighted cumulative causal effect as a function of restriction time. We prove that the proposed estimators are consistent, asymptotically linear, and reach semiparametric efficiency bounds under regularity conditions. Our simulations show that the proposed estimators using nonparametric machine learning nuisance models perform as well as established methods that require correctly-specified parametric nuisance models, illustrating that our estimators mitigate the need for oracle parametric nuisance models. We apply the proposed methods to real-world observational data from a UK primary care database to compare the effects of anti-diabetic drugs on cancer clinical outcomes.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文