跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

分类依据题名和摘要中的方法词与领域语境,不使用期刊名称猜测研究方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Léopold Simar

原文摘要

Summary In production theory, conditional frontiers and conditional efficiency measures are flexible and appealing tools to investigate the role of environmental variables in the production process. Direct approaches estimate non-parametrically conditional distribution functions requiring smoothing techniques and the use of bandwidths. Traditional methods for selecting bandwidths provide bandwidths of orders that may not be optimal for estimating the boundary of the distribution function. In this paper we suggest an approach that avoids this problem by eliminating in a first step, with flexible control functions, the influence of environmental factors on the inputs and the outputs. We thereby produce ‘pure’ inputs and outputs that make it possible to estimate a ‘pure’ measure of efficiency, which is more reliable for ranking the firms because the influence of external factors has been eliminated. We are also able to recover the frontier and efficiencies in the original units. This can be viewed as an extension of location-scale models for whitening the variables, avoiding often inappropriate restrictions. We describe the method and its statistical properties, and we show through Monte Carlo simulations how our new method dominates both the traditional direct and the location-scale approaches. We illustrate the usefulness of the approach with a real data set on banks.

笔记与分组