跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦通用线性回归的模型不确定性与先验选择,未明确所列领域细分的特定研究对象。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Carmen Fernández
Eduardo Ley
Mark F.J. Steel

贝叶斯模型平均的基准先验

研究问题
在线性回归的解释变量选择存在不确定性、主观先验信息很少时,如何设定基准先验,避免后验模型概率对先验过度敏感?
方法与思路
作者提出与共轭 g-prior 相关的部分非信息先验,比较超参数选择的理论及模拟性质,并用 MC3 计算和犯罪经济学实例说明。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,论文研究贝叶斯程序的一致性及与经典信息准则的联系,比较有限样本后验和预测表现,并据此提出基准先验设定。
阅读关注点
应核对具体先验和超参数取值、不同模型间先验的可比性、一致性条件,以及 MC3 的计算诊断和模拟中的预测评价方式。
阅读边界
仅据所给作者/机构库版本摘要,基准先验的最终形式和比较结果未说明,不能判断其普遍优势;一般预测比较不构成宏观预测证据。

原文摘要

In contrast to a posterior analysis given a particular sampling model, posterior model probabilities in the context of model uncertainty are typically rather sensitive to the specification of the prior. In particular, 'diffuse' priors on model-specific parameters can lead to quite unexpected consequences. Here we focus on the practically relevant situation where we need to entertain a (large) number of sampling models and we have (or wish to use) little or no subjective prior information. We aim at providing an 'automatic' or 'benchmark' prior structure that can be used in such cases. We focus on the normal linear regression model with uncertainty in the choice of regressors. We propose a partly non-informative prior structure related to a natural conjugate g-prior specification, where the amount of subjective information requested from the user is limited to the choice of a single scalar hyperparameter g(0j). The consequences of different choices for g(0j) are examined, We investigate theoretical properties, such as consistency of the implied Bayesian procedure. Links with classical information criteria are provided. More importantly, we examine the finite sample implications of several choices of g(0j) in a simulation study. The use of the MC3 algorithm of Madigan and York (Int. Stat. Rev. 63 (1995) 215), combined with efficient coding in Fortran, makes it feasible to conduct large simulations. In addition to posterior criteria, we shall also compare the predictive performance of different priors. A classic example concerning the economics of crime will also be provided and contrasted with results in the literature. The main findings of the paper will lead us to propose a 'benchmark' prior specification in a linear regression context with model uncertainty. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved. JEL classification: C11; C15.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文