跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要中的网络指生物异常组合结构,未涉及经济网络、个体干扰或明确的因果效应识别。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Michael A Newton

发现与癌症相关的基因组异常组合

研究问题
如何从癌症基因组拷贝数变异中识别相关异常组合,并通过概率模型表达肿瘤异质性以及异常之间的正负依赖?
方法与思路
作者结合随机基因组不稳定、异常组合触发的肿瘤选择和组合网络,使用双重 Pólya 先验及 MCMC 进行后验计算。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称组合网络是可识别参数;在一百一十六例肾细胞癌重分析中,方法输出异常相关概率、组合关系及异常与肿瘤聚类。
阅读关注点
应核对选择条件如何产生异常依赖、组合网络的识别条件、先验与后验计算,以及聚类和癌症相关性解释的边界。
阅读边界
仅据稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 摘要;具体识别条件与后验结果未说明,模型给出的相关性不能直接视为致癌因果证据。

原文摘要

This article introduces a model-based statistical methodology for the analysis of copy-number variations in cancer genomes measured by comparative genomic hybridization. The methodology allows one to infer combinations of genomic aberrations associated with the cancer phenotype. The stochastic model conjoins two features of cancer biology to infuse some context into an otherwise unsupervised learning problem. It asserts random genomic instability in a potential progenitor cell, followed by selection into a tumor of the descending cell lineage if the lineage experiences certain ensembles of genomic aberration. Disease heterogeneity is reflected in the possibility of a network containing multiple ensembles. The network of ensembles is an identifiable parameter. By forming the sampling model conditionally on selection, statistical dependencies (both positive and negative) can be induced between aberrations, and the model entails heterogeneity in the marginal rate of occurrence of aberrations. A double-Pólya distribution is introduced as a prior over the network of ensembles, and Markov chain Monte Carlo is developed to enable posterior computation. As an example, the methodology is used to reanalyze genomic aberrations from 116 renal cell carcinomas. It produces posterior probabilities that any given aberration is relevant to oncogenesis, posterior probabilities that pairs of aberrations reside in a common ensemble, and a point estimate of the network of ensembles. The methodology provides a model-based clustering of all measured aberrations according to these estimated ensembles and a model-based clustering of tumors according to the probable ensembles of genomic aberration that they have experienced. Although it is formulated here to analyze aberrations in cancer genomes, the instability-selection-network model may provide an approach to modeling dependence in correlated binary data on various biological systems. Limitations and possible extensions of the methodology are discussed.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文