跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究死亡截断下的幸存者平均因果效应、部分识别界及工具变量扩展。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Fan Yang
Dylan S. Small

死亡截断问题中利用结局测量后的信息

研究问题
非死亡结局因死亡而无法测量时,能否利用测量前后的生存信息,收紧两种处理下均能存活者的平均因果效应界?
方法与思路
作者提出利用测量前后生存信息的排序平均得分假设,并以两步线性规划求得幸存者平均因果效应的闭式界。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称临床试验应用所得界比仅使用测量前生存信息更短;不依从试验及工具变量下依从者效应的扩展位于在线补充材料。
阅读关注点
应核对排序假设的含义与可信度、目标幸存者群体、界的构造与推断,并区分主文结果和补充材料中的依从者扩展。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;界的收紧依赖新增假设,具体条件与数值未说明,不能推断点识别或所有应用均得到同等改善。

原文摘要

Summary Many clinical studies on non-mortality outcomes such as quality of life suffer from the problem that the non-mortality outcome can be censored by death, i.e. the non-mortality outcome cannot be measured if the subject dies before the time of measurement. To address the problem that this censoring by death is informative, it is of interest to consider the average effect of the treatment on the non-mortality outcome among subjects whose measurement would not be censored under either treatment or control, which is called the survivor average causal effect (SACE). The SACE is not point identified under usual assumptions but bounds can be constructed. The previous literature on bounding the SACE uses only the survival information before the measurement of the non-mortality outcome. However, survival information after the measurement of the non-mortality outcome could also be informative. For randomized trials, we propose a set of ranked average score assumptions that make use of survival information before and after the measurement of the non-mortality outcome which are plausibly satisfied in many studies and we develop a two-step linear programming approach to obtain the closed form for bounds on the SACE under our assumptions. We also extend our method to randomized trials with non-compliance or observational studies with a valid instrumental variable to obtain bounds on the complier SACE which is presented in on-line supplementary material. We apply our method to a randomized trial of the effect of mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volume versus traditional tidal volume for acute lung injury patients. Our bounds on the SACE are much shorter than the bounds that are obtained by using only the survival information before the measurement of the non-mortality outcome.

笔记与分组