Hierarchical Bayesian Nonresponse Models for Binary Data From Small Areas With Uncertainty About Ignorability
可忽略性不确定下的小区域二元数据分层贝叶斯无响应模型AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是小区域调查无响应与贝叶斯建模,二元结果本身不足以归入离散选择或因果推断。
可忽略性不确定下的小区域二元数据分层贝叶斯无响应模型AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In the National Crime Survey (NCS), data on victimization can be poststratified into domains determined by urbanization, type of place, and poverty level. There is much difficulty in the analysis of binary data with substantial nonresponse. We consider three Bayesian hierarchical models for binary nonresponse data, like those from the NCS, which are clustered within a number of domains or areas. As in small area estimation, one key feature is that each model “borrows strength” across the areas through the selection approach to nonresponse. This is necessary to estimate the parameters with the least association to the observed data (i.e., weakly identified parameters). The first model assumes that the nonresponse mechanism is ignorable, and the second model assumes that it is nonignorable. We argue that a discrete model expansion (a probabilistic mixture) may be inappropriate for modeling uncertainty about ignorability. Therefore, we propose a third model through a continuous model expansion on an odds ratio for each area. When the odds ratio is 1, we have the ignorable model; otherwise, the model is nonignorable. One important feature is that uncertainty about ignorability is incorporated by “centering” on the ignorable model. We analyze the poststratified data from the NCS to reveal latent features associated with nonresponse. The complexity of the posterior distributions of the parameters forces us to implement the methodology using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. When the proportion of households with a characteristic (i.e., victimization in the NCS) and the response probability of a household in the population are estimated, we find that the nonignorable model and the expansion model are similar but that they differ from the ignorable model. Although considerable prior information about the nonresponse mechanism is needed, the expansion model indicates that nonresponse for most of the areas is nonignorable. An analysis shows that inference is not very sensitive to an important distribution assumption, and a simulation exercise shows that the expansion model works very well.