High-Dimensional Model-Assisted Inference for Local Average Treatment Effects With Instrumental Variables
工具变量下局部平均处理效应的高维模型辅助推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以工具变量下的局部平均处理效应及高维协变量调整后的稳健推断为核心,文本直接支持归入因果推断。
工具变量下局部平均处理效应的高维模型辅助推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Consider the problem of estimating the local average treatment effect with an instrument variable, where the instrument unconfoundedness holds after adjusting for a set of measured covariates. Several unknown functions of the covariates need to be estimated through regression models, such as instrument propensity score and treatment and outcome regression models. We develop a computationally tractable method in high-dimensional settings where the numbers of regression terms are close to or larger than the sample size. Our method exploits regularized calibrated estimation for estimating coefficients in these regression models, and then employs a doubly robust point estimator for the treatment parameter. We provide rigorous theoretical analysis to show that the resulting Wald confidence intervals are valid for the treatment parameter under suitable sparsity conditions if the instrument propensity score model is correctly specified, but the treatment and outcome regression models may be misspecified. In this sense, our confidence intervals are instrument propensity score model based, and treatment and outcome regression models assisted. For existing high-dimensional methods, valid confidence intervals are obtained for the treatment parameter if all three models are correctly specified. We evaluate the proposed method via extensive simulation studies and an empirical application to estimate the returns to education. The methods are implemented in the R package RCAL.