跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要主要涉及通用高维筛选、虚假相关与检验理论,未明确对应所列领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jianqing Fan
Qi-Man Shao
Wen-Xin Zhou

发现是否虚假?最大虚假相关的分布及应用

研究问题
在预测变量很多而样本有限时,变量筛选发现的相关性可能有多大比例源于偶然匹配,又如何检验协变量外生性相关假设?
方法与思路
作者利用高斯近似与经验过程分析独立情形下的最大虚假相关分布,再用乘子自助法估计未知分布,并扩展至正则化残差。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称建立了固定及增长预测变量数量下的分布理论与自助法一致性,进而构造虚假相关上置信限和协变量外生性检验。
阅读关注点
应核对受限特征值条件、维度增长限制、检验原假设与外生性的具体定义,以及正则化残差如何影响近似和自助法有效性。
阅读边界
以下沿用原解读对于其预印本摘要的限制:所给版本为 arXiv 预印本,不能据此认定已同行评审或接收;摘要未给出检验功效及完整条件,不能保证排除所有虚假发现。 复用旧预印本摘要解读;摘要与本条目相同,未另读刊稿全文,原请求未记录具体预印本版本。

原文摘要

Over the last two decades, many exciting variable selection methods have been developed for finding a small group of covariates that are associated with the response from a large pool. Can the discoveries from these data mining approaches be spurious due to high dimensionality and limited sample size? Can our fundamental assumptions about the exogeneity of the covariates needed for such variable selection be validated with the data? To answer these questions, we need to derive the distributions of the maximum spurious correlations given a certain number of predictors, namely, the distribution of the correlation of a response variable $Y$ with the best $s$ linear combinations of $p$ covariates $\mathbf{X}$, even when $\mathbf{X}$ and $Y$ are independent. When the covariance matrix of $\mathbf{X}$ possesses the restricted eigenvalue property, we derive such distributions for both a finite $s$ and a diverging $s$, using Gaussian approximation and empirical process techniques. However, such a distribution depends on the unknown covariance matrix of $\mathbf{X}$. Hence, we use the multiplier bootstrap procedure to approximate the unknown distributions and establish the consistency of such a simple bootstrap approach. The results are further extended to the situation where the residuals are from regularized fits. Our approach is then used to construct the upper confidence limit for the maximum spurious correlation and to test the exogeneity of the covariates. The former provides a baseline for guarding against false discoveries and the latter tests whether our fundamental assumptions for high-dimensional model selection are statistically valid. Our techniques and results are illustrated with both numerical examples and real data analysis.

笔记与分组