跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论面板数据中的截面依赖、异质性及面板单位根和协整检验。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Badi H. Baltagi
M. Hashem Pesaran

面板数据模型中的异质性与截面依赖:理论与应用专题导言

研究问题
面板模型中的截面依赖与个体异质性为何重要,忽略空间溢出或共同因素会怎样影响单位根、协整检验及应用研究?
方法与思路
这篇专题导言梳理截面依赖的来源,介绍考虑依赖的第二代面板检验,并按相关主题概述专题所收录的理论与实证论文。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要强调截面独立假设失效可能造成检验尺寸扭曲,并展示该专题在依赖处理、异质性控制及相关实证应用上的研究布局。
阅读关注点
应区分导言的综述判断与各篇论文的具体结果,核对第二代检验处理哪些依赖形式,以及异质性与共同因素如何分别建模。
阅读边界
这是专题导言,不能把所介绍论文的成果当作导言自身的新定理或估计方法;摘要未提供各项检验的条件与比较结果。

原文摘要

Abstract The papers included in this special issue are primarily concerned with the problem of cross section dependence and heterogeneity in the analysis of panel data models and their relevance in applied econometric research. Cross section dependence can arise due to spatial or spill over effects, or could be due to unobserved (or unobservable) common factors. Much of the recent research on non‐stationary panel data have focussed on this problem. It was clear that the first generation panel unit root and cointegration tests developed in the 1990's, which assumed cross‐sectional independence, are inadequate and could lead to significant size distortions in the presence of neglected cross‐section dependence. Second generation panel unit root and cointegration tests that take account of possible cross‐section dependence in the data have been developed, see the recent surveys by Choi ( 2006 ) and Breitung and Pesaran ( 2007 ). The papers by Baltagi, Bresson and Pirotte, Choi and Chue, Kapetanios, and Pesaran in this special issue are further contributions to this literature. The papers by Fachin, and Moon and Perron are empirical studies in this area. Controlling for heterogeneity has also been an important concern for empirical researchers with panel data methods promising better handle on heterogeneity than cross‐section data methods. The papers by Hsiao, Shen, Wang and Weeks, Pedroni and Serlenga and Shin are empirical contributions to this area. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文