Likelihood and Cost as Path Integrals
作为路径积分的似然与成本AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确围绕时间序列的估计、预测、控制与递归估计展开,直接属于时间序列方法。
作为路径积分的似然与成本AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
SUMMARY We consider the optimal estimation, prediction and control etc. of time series. The essence of a path integral characterization is considered to be that optimal estimates and decisions etc. are obtained by the free extremization of some form. In Sections 2–5 it is shown for some stock situations that this property is ensured by the direct maximization of likelihood (rather than by appeal to the formally equivalent but operationally contrasting least square principle). In Sections 6–9 a risk-sensitive criterion is taken, in that the criterion is an exponential function of cost rather than cost itself. It is shown that this class of problems admits a natural path integral treatment, in which extremization of stress replaces separate extremization of likelihood and cost. A stochastic maximum principle is derived. For the linear–quadratic–Gaussian (LQG) case, results are exact and depend on proof of a certainty equivalence principle. In the non-LQG case they are valid as large deviation approximations, depending on a formalism going back to Bartlett. Finally, in Sections 10 and 11 we note the efficacy (if not indeed the necessity) of direct likelihood arguments in two other time series areas: recursive estimation and structural models.