跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确结合高频数据、特质波动率依赖与波动率因子分解,直接对应这三个金融计量方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ilze Kalnina
Kokouvi Tewou

特质波动率的横截面依赖

研究问题
使用高频数据估计资产特质波动率之间的依赖时,如何处理波动率估计误差,并判断系统性波动因素能否解释这些依赖?
方法与思路
作者为特质波动率的协方差、相关系数及因子分解构造偏差修正估计量,并发展检验剩余非系统性成分横截面依赖的渐近理论。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,标普100成分股存在较强的特质波动率依赖,考察的两组因子均不能完全解释该依赖,并据此绘制残余依赖网络。
阅读关注点
应核对特质波动率的提取方式、估计误差如何进入偏差修正,以及因子设定、残余依赖检验与网络边的统计判定规则。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 RePEc 出版社摘要;采样频率、样本区间、渐近条件和检验细节未说明,实证结论的稳健性及其他版本变化不能据此判断。

原文摘要

This paper introduces an econometric framework for analyzing cross-sectional dependence in the idiosyncratic volatilities of assets using high frequency data. We first consider the estimation of standard measures of dependence in the idiosyncratic volatilities such as covariances and correlations. Naive estimators of these measures are biased due to the use of the error-laden estimates of idiosyncratic volatilities. We provide bias-corrected estimators and the relevant asymptotic theory. Next, we introduce an idiosyncratic volatility factor model, in which we decompose the variation in idiosyncratic volatilities into two parts: the variation related to the systematic factors such as the market volatility, and the residual variation. Again, naive estimators of the decomposition are biased, and we provide bias-corrected estimators. We also provide the asymptotic theory that allows us to test whether the residual (non-systematic) components of the idiosyncratic volatilities exhibit cross-sectional dependence. We apply our methodology to the S&P 100 index constituents, and document strong cross-sectional dependence in their idiosyncratic volatilities. We consider two different sets of idiosyncratic volatility factors, and find that neither can fully account for the cross-sectional dependence in idiosyncratic volatilities. For each model, we map out the network of dependencies in residual (non-systematic) idiosyncratic volatilities across all stocks.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文