跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用树集成解释与预测误差,没有宏观预测、收益预测或因果效应识别的明确依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Brian Liu
Rahul Mazumder
Peter Radchenko

从树集成中提取可解释模型:计算与统计视角

研究问题
如何从预测准确但难解释的树集成中提取紧凑决策规则,并同时控制规则数量与交互深度,兼顾模型可读性和预测表现?
方法与思路
作者提出受复杂度约束的规则提取估计量,设计求解优化问题的专用精确算法及计算正则化路径的近似算法,并分析预测误差。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称给出相对于同等复杂度约束下数据依赖规则组合 oracle 的非渐近误差界,并在实验中显示优于现有规则提取算法。
阅读关注点
应核对规则复杂度约束、oracle 的信息范围、误差界适用条件,以及精确求解的可扩展性和规则解释在不同样本中的稳定性。
阅读边界
仅据稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;误差界条件、比较方法与数值结果未说明,规则揭示的预测关系不能直接解释为因果机制,也不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Tree ensembles are non-parametric methods widely recognized for their accuracy and ability to capture complex interactions. While these models excel at prediction, they are difficult to interpret and may fail to uncover useful relationships in the data. We propose an estimator to extract compact sets of decision rules from tree ensembles. The extracted models are accurate and can be manually examined to reveal relationships between the predictors and the response. A key novelty of our estimator is the flexibility to jointly control the number of rules extracted and the interaction depth of each rule, which improves accuracy. We develop a tailored exact algorithm to efficiently solve optimization problems underlying our estimator and an approximate algorithm for computing regularization paths — sequences of solutions that correspond to varying model sizes. We also establish novel non-asymptotic prediction error bounds for our proposed approach, comparing it to an oracle that chooses the best data-dependent linear combination of the rules in the ensemble subject to the same complexity constraint as our estimator. The bounds illustrate that the large-sample predictive performance of our estimator is on par with that of the oracle. Through experiments, we demonstrate that our estimator outperforms existing algorithms for rule extraction.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文