跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦通用方差分量检验与贝叶斯计算,未明确涉及所列经济计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Donna K. Pauler
Robert E. Kass

方差分量模型的贝叶斯因子及其近似

研究问题
研究如何在方差分量检验中选择参考先验并计算贝叶斯因子,尤其处理零假设位于参数边界造成的计算困难。
方法与思路
作者提出单位信息参考方法,结合重要性抽样、拒绝采样与边界Laplace近似,并通过模拟和不平衡数据实例考察表现。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称这些方法提供可实施的贝叶斯因子计算与后验采样方案,并研究边界近似的准确性及其与Schwarz准则的关系。
阅读关注点
应核对参考先验的具体定义、边界近似的成立条件、子样本似然如何形成提议分布,以及模拟比较所采用的评价标准。
阅读边界
材料为版本未注明的OpenAlex索引摘要;精度阶记号“op1)”不完整,需查原PDF,不能重构公式或推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

In this article we consider tests of variance components using Bayes factors. Such tests arise in many fields of application, including medicine, agriculture, and engineering. When using Bayes factors, the choice of prior distribution on the parameter of interest is of great importance; we propose a “unit-information” reference method for variance component models. The calculation of Bayes factors in this context is not straightforward; there are well-documented difficulties with Markov chain Monte Carlo approaches such as Gibbs sampling, and the usual Laplace approximation is not appropriate, due to the boundary null hypothesis. We describe both an importance sampling approach and an analytical approximation for calculating the numerator and denominator of the Bayes factor. The importance sampling approach is straightforward to implement and also forms the basis for a rejection algorithm that allows generation of samples from the posterior distributions under the null and alternative hypotheses. We suggest that the proposal for the rejection algorithm be based on the likelihood of a subset of the data. For large samples, we develop a boundary Laplace approximation that is accurate to order op1). We investigate the accuracy of the approximation via simulation, and examine its relationship to the Schwarz criterion. We illustrate the importance sampling/rejection method and boundary Laplace approximation on a number of examples, including a challenging two-way, highly unbalanced dataset and compare our methods with frequentist alternatives.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文