Influence Diagnostics in Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity Processes
GARCH过程中的影响诊断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以GARCH为核心模型,使用股票指数日收益研究局部扰动与有影响观测,最直接对应金融波动率计量。
GARCH过程中的影响诊断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Influence diagnostics have become important tools for statistical analysis since the seminal work by Cook. In this article we present a curvature-based directional diagnostic, set up based on the slope-based diagnostic to assess the local influence of minor perturbations on influence graph in a regression model. Using both slope- and curvature-based diagnostics, we examine local influence in the generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model under two perturbation schemes that involve model perturbation and data perturbation. We present a Monte Carlo study to obtain the approximate benchmark for determining the significance of a directional diagnostic, as well as the threshold for locating influential observations. An empirical study involving GARCH modeling of the continuously compounded daily return of the New York Stock Exchange composite index illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed diagnostics. The empirical study also shows that the curvature-based diagnostic can find a cluster of additive shocks that cannot be discovered by the slope-based diagnostic. Because observations may have different effects on the influence graph under different perturbation schemes, and both the slope-based and the curvature-based diagnostics are useful for assessing local influence (especially in GARCH models), it is advisable to assess local influence under different perturbation schemes through both diagnostics.