跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确利用随机分配评估教育项目的处理效应,并讨论教师流动引起的跨校溢出,直接涉及因果推断与干扰。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Juan F. Castro
Paul Glewwe
Ricardo Montero

教学能否被教会?秘鲁农村教师教学技能的大规模提升

研究问题
在教师流动频繁的秘鲁农村,大规模教师辅导能否改善教学技能与学生学习,教师流动又如何影响项目效果的定义和估计?
方法与思路
作者利用2016年向3797所农村学校随机扩展项目的安排进行评估,并建立框架,区分教师流动下不同的处理效应及其可估计性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,项目使教师综合教学技能提高0.20个标准差,并改善学生数学与阅读成绩;框架还用于估计连续三年接受充分辅导教师教学的效果。
阅读关注点
应核对随机分配后的教师流动、未参与学校受到的溢出,以及连续三年充分辅导的效果如何识别,区分分配效应与持续辅导效应。
阅读边界
仅依据所给Crossref摘要;持续充分辅导效应所需的具体识别条件、失访处理和统计不确定性未说明,不能据此推广到其他教育制度。

原文摘要

We evaluate the impact of a large‐scale teacher coaching program in Peru, a context with high teacher turnover, on teachers' pedagogical skills and student learning. Previous studies find that small‐scale coaching programs can improve teaching of reading and science in developing countries. However, scaling up can reduce programs' effectiveness, and teacher turnover can erode compliance and cause spillovers onto non‐program schools. We develop a framework that defines different treatment effects when teacher turnover is present, and explains which effects can be estimated. We evaluate this teacher coaching program, exploiting random assignment of that program's expansion to 3797 rural schools in 2016. After two years, teachers assigned to the program increased their aggregate pedagogical skills by 0.20 standard deviations. The program also increased student learning; after 1 year, Grade 2 students' mathematics and reading scores increased by 0.106 and 0.075 standard deviations (of the distributions of those test scores), respectively. After three years, the cumulative effect increases slightly, to 0.114 and 0.100, respectively. One reason why these impacts are low is that some uncoached teachers moved into treated schools in years 2 and 3. Following our framework, we estimate that the impacts on students of having a “fully” coached teacher for all three years are 0.18 and 0.16 standard deviations for mathematics and reading comprehension, respectively.

笔记与分组