本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本；arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历，都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对，只展示已核实例，档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要明确涉及工具变量、依从者因果效应、主分层及试验结果的人群推广。
结合 BART 与主分层估计避孕使用对就业的影响：尼日利亚与塞内加尔AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
There is interest in learning about the causal effects of modern contraceptive use on empowerment outcomes. Data on this question often come from family planning (FP) programs that increase access to FP and facilitate contraceptive use among some women, rather than directly assigning use. Women whose contraceptive behavior changes because of these programs ("compliers") may differ from target populations in ways that alter the consequences of contraceptive use for empowerment outcomes. We propose a two-step approach. First, we use principal stratification and Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) to estimate the effect of modern contraceptive use among compliers in the study population, treating the FP program as an instrument rather than as the treatment of interest. Second, we generalize these complier-specific effects to a broader population by averaging conditional effects over the covariate distribution in the target population, with uncertainty in that distribution quantified via a Bayesian bootstrap applied to external complex survey data. We examine performance in simulation designs previously used to evaluate IV estimators. We then apply the approach to employment among urban women in Nigeria and Senegal, finding strong and heterogeneous effects of contraceptive use. Sensitivity analyses suggest robustness to violations of assumptions for internal and external validity.