跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要针对无标签总体中的分类性能迁移推断,未直接涉及因果效应或金融收益预测。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Doudou Zhou
Molei Liu
Mengyan Li
Tianxi Cai

高维特征下的双重稳健增广模型准确度迁移推断

研究问题
只有源总体具有标签、目标总体没有标签且协变量分布发生变化时,如何估计目标总体的分类性能并给出置信区间?
方法与思路
作者提出 DRAMATIC,结合响应均值插补模型与描述分布迁移的密度比模型,利用两总体的高维特征构造增广估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在一定稀疏性条件下,两辅助模型任一正确即可支持有效推断;模拟与糖尿病遗传风险模型迁移应用展示其作用。
阅读关注点
应核对源与目标总体之间的迁移假设、稀疏性及模型正确性的具体要求,以及风险模型误设时准确度推断的目标。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;迁移识别条件、覆盖率数值和适用性能指标细节未说明,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Transfer learning is crucial for training models that generalize to unlabeled target populations using labeled source data, especially in real-world studies where label scarcity and covariate shift are common. While most research focuses on model estimation, there is limited literature on transfer inference for model accuracy despite its importance. We introduce a novel Doubly Robust Augmented Model Accuracy Transfer Inferen Ce (DRAMATIC) method for point and interval estimation of commonly used classification performance measures in an unlabeled target population with labeled source data. DRAMATIC derives and evaluates a potentially misspecified risk model for a binary response, leveraging high-dimensional adjustment features from both source and target data. It builds on an imputation model for the response mean and a density ratio model to characterize distributional shifts. The method constructs doubly robust estimators that are valid when either model is correctly specified and certain sparsity assumptions hold. Simulations show negligible bias in point estimation and satisfactory empirical coverage levels in confidence intervals. The utility of DRAMATIC is illustrated by transferring a genetic risk prediction model and its accuracy evaluation for type II diabetes across two patient cohorts in Mass General Brigham (MGB). Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文