跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般高维均值检验,没有因果效应、分位数效应或金融应用的明确依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yunlu Jiang
Xueqin Wang
Canhong Wen
Yukang Jiang
Heping Zhang

通过随机积分检验高维两样本均值相等

研究问题
如何构造适应不同信号结构的高维两样本均值检验,并避免统一要求两组协方差相同或均值差具有稀疏结构?
方法与思路
作者对两样本均值差进行随机积分,建立包含并扩展既有检验的框架,在一般多元模型下分析统计量的渐近性质。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该框架给出特定弱稠密且近乎同号信号下功效趋于一的结果,并刻画相对Pitman效率不低于竞品的条件。
阅读关注点
应核对随机积分分布、统计量标准化和多元模型条件,重点比较不同备择结构下的功效及相对效率结论。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的OpenAlex索引摘要,不能推断刊本变化;未显式规定维度与样本量关系,不代表没有其他渐近限制。

原文摘要

Testing the equality of the means in two samples is a fundamental statistical inferential problem. Most of the existing methods are based on the sum-of-squares or supremum statistics. They are possibly powerful in some situations, but not in others, and they do not work in a unified way. Using random integration of the difference, we develop a framework that includes and extends many existing methods, especially in high-dimensional settings, without restricting the same covariance matrices or sparsity. Under a general multivariate model, we can derive the asymptotic properties of the proposed test statistic without specifying a relationship between the data dimension and sample size explicitly. Specifically, the new framework allows us to better understand the test's properties and select a powerful procedure accordingly. For example, we prove that our proposed test can achieve the power of 1 when nonzero signals in the true mean differences are weakly dense with nearly the same sign. In addition, we delineate the conditions under which the asymptotic relative Pitman efficiency of our proposed test to its competitor is greater than or equal to 1. Extensive numerical studies and a real data example demonstrate the potential of our proposed test.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文