跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究观察数据中的因果效应、无混杂条件及匹配和加权估计,测量误差是其因果识别问题的核心。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
J. R. Lockwood

利用含测量误差协变量的函数进行因果匹配与加权

研究问题
当观察研究中的协变量只是潜在混杂因素的含误差代理时,哪些观测协变量函数能支持无混杂的因果匹配或加权?
方法与思路
作者推导匹配与加权函数的必要充分条件,考察连续误差、错分类和潜变量模型,并讨论分组构造函数及额外加噪。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称多种常见误差设定中不存在适用于所有单位的单一匹配函数,但某些情形下分组函数或选择性加噪可构造适当变量。
阅读关注点
应核对必要充分条件中的可观测与潜在量、处理组和对照组函数的构造,以及额外加噪何时有效及其信息代价。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;分组函数与加噪有效的具体条件未说明,不能把特殊情形推广为通用误差校正方案或推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Matching estimators are commonly used to estimate causal effects in nonexperimental settings. Covariate measurement error can be problematic for matching estimators when observational treatment groups differ on latent quantities observed only through error-prone surrogates. We establish necessary and sufficient conditions for matching and weighting with functions of observed covariates to yield unconfounded causal effect estimators, generalizing results from the standard (i.e., no measurement error) case. We establish that in common covariate measurement error settings, including continuous variables with continuous measurement error, discrete variables with misclassification, and factor and item response theory models, no single function of the observed covariates computed for all units in a study is appropriate for matching. However, we demonstrate that in some circumstances, it is possible to create different functions of the observed covariates for treatment and control units to construct a variable appropriate for matching. We also demonstrate the counterintuitive result that in some settings, it is possible to selectively contaminate the covariates with additional measurement error to construct a variable appropriate for matching. We discuss the implications of our results for the choice between matching and weighting estimators with error-prone covariates. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组