跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究协变量自适应随机试验中的平均处理效应检验。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Federico A. Bugni
Ivan A. Canay
Azeem M. Shaikh

协变量自适应随机化下的推断

研究问题
随机试验先按基线协变量分层,再通过层内处理分配实现平衡时,常用平均处理效应检验能否保持名义显著性水平?
方法与思路
作者分析两样本检验、含分层指标的回归检验和层内置换检验,并提出标准误或统计量调整以改善渐近尺寸。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,常用检验在若干设定下偏保守,部分置换检验可能过度拒绝;适当调整可在所述条件下达到渐近名义水平。
阅读关注点
应核对随机化分配比例的极限条件、强平衡的定义及各检验的适用范围;比例特殊值的乱码需查阅原 PDF。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;“π=12”等符号含义不清,不能重构其特殊值。摘要的精确性指渐近尺寸,不能据此声称有限样本精确或推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

This article studies inference for the average treatment effect in randomized controlled trials with covariate-adaptive randomization. Here, by covariate-adaptive randomization, we mean randomization schemes that first stratify according to baseline covariates and then assign treatment status so as to achieve “balance” within each stratum. Our main requirement is that the randomization scheme assigns treatment status within each stratum so that the fraction of units being assigned to treatment within each stratum has a well behaved distribution centered around a proportion π as the sample size tends to infinity. Such schemes include, for example, Efron’s biased-coin design and stratified block randomization. When testing the null hypothesis that the average treatment effect equals a prespecified value in such settings, we first show the usual two-sample t-test is conservative in the sense that it has limiting rejection probability under the null hypothesis no greater than and typically strictly less than the nominal level. We show, however, that a simple adjustment to the usual standard error of the two-sample t-test leads to a test that is exact in the sense that its limiting rejection probability under the null hypothesis equals the nominal level. Next, we consider the usual t-test (on the coefficient on treatment assignment) in a linear regression of outcomes on treatment assignment and indicators for each of the strata. We show that this test is exact for the important special case of randomization schemes with π=12, but is otherwise conservative. We again provide a simple adjustment to the standard errors that yields an exact test more generally. Finally, we study the behavior of a modified version of a permutation test, which we refer to as the covariate-adaptive permutation test, that only permutes treatment status for units within the same stratum. When applied to the usual two-sample t-statistic, we show that this test is exact for randomization schemes with π=12 and that additionally achieve what we refer to as “strong balance.” For randomization schemes with π≠12, this test may have limiting rejection probability under the null hypothesis strictly greater than the nominal level. When applied to a suitably adjusted version of the two-sample t-statistic, however, we show that this test is exact for all randomization schemes that achieve “strong balance,” including those with π≠12. A simulation study confirms the practical relevance of our theoretical results. We conclude with recommendations for empirical practice and an empirical illustration. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文