跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕群组随机试验中的总因果效应、筛查中介及缺失状态展开,明确提出因果目标和 TMLE 估计方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Joy Zora Nakato
Janice Litunya
Brian Beesiga
Jane Kabami
James Ayieko
Moses R. Kamya
Gabriel Chamie
Laura B. Balzer

评估扩大筛查与改善结局策略总效应的因果框架

研究问题
当策略在群组层面实施、筛查与健康结局位于个体层面,且潜在状态仅对接受筛查者可见时,应如何定义和估计策略总效应?
方法与思路
作者用反事实分层效应定义目标,处理目标群体成员身份缺失或受干预影响的情况,并扩展两阶段 TMLE 进行识别与估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,框架将群组干预、筛查中介和状态缺失纳入总效应分析,并通过模拟展示所提方法的表现及现有方法的局限。
阅读关注点
核对反事实分层与总效应的精确定义、缺失状态的识别条件,以及两阶段 TMLE 如何处理群组结构、筛查路径和不确定性。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未核实;摘要未列出缺失机制、完整识别假设及两阶段估计所需条件。

原文摘要

For many health conditions, there are highly efficacious treatment and prevention products. Maximizing their impact requires strategies that improve the reach of health screening in order to establish who could benefit. For example, HIV prevention strategies aim to expand risk screening and to improve uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among those experiencing risk. Often, these strategies induce changes at the group-level (e.g., health clinics or communities) and are evaluated through cluster randomized trials. This scenario creates a complex, multilevel-mediation-missing data problem for the following reasons. First, the strategy is delivered at the cluster-level, while health screening and outcomes are at the individual-level. Second, the strategy improves health outcomes directly and indirectly through improved health screening. Third, everyone has an underlying status, which is only observed among those screened. To formally define the total effect in such settings, we use Counterfactual Strata Effects: causal estimands where the outcome is only relevant for a group whose membership is subject to missingness and/ or impacted by the exposure of interest. To identify and estimate the corresponding statistical estimand, we propose a novel extension of Two-Stage targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE). Simulations demonstrate the practical performance of our approach as well as the limitations of existing approaches.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文