跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究平均处理效应、倾向得分、逆概率加权及双重稳健性,直接对应因果推断中的处理效应估计方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jianqing Fan
Kosuke Imai
Inbeom Lee
Han Liu
Yang Ning
Xiaolin Yang

倾向得分估计中的最优协变量平衡条件

研究问题
逆概率处理加权估计平均处理效应时,倾向得分模型误设如何影响偏差与效率,怎样选择协变量平衡条件以改善这些性质?
方法与思路
作者先在局部模型误设下刻画CBPS加权估计的偏差与效率,据此选择平衡函数并构造最优估计,再用筛法放松参数化要求。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所提估计具有双重稳健性,两模型正确时局部半参数有效;筛法扩展在较弱条件下全局有效,且相较现有估计量渐近偏差更小。
阅读关注点
核对最优平衡函数与结果模型的关系、局部误设框架和ATE识别条件,并区分双重稳健、局部效率及筛法全局效率各自的前提。
阅读边界
仅据出版社摘要,处理效应识别的具体假设、筛法复杂度与偏差比较对象未说明;双重稳健性不能涵盖两个模型同时误设的所有情形。

原文摘要

Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) is a popular method for estimating the average treatment effect (ATE). However, empirical studies show that the IPTW estimators can be sensitive to the misspecification of the propensity score model. To address this problem, researchers have proposed to estimate propensity score by directly optimizing the balance of pretreatment covariates. While these methods appear to empirically perform well, little is known about how the choice of balancing conditions affects their theoretical properties. To fill this gap, we first characterize the asymptotic bias and efficiency of the IPTW estimator based on the covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) methodology under local model misspecification. Based on this analysis, we show how to optimally choose the covariate balancing functions and propose an optimal CBPS-based IPTW estimator. This estimator is doubly robust; it is consistent for the ATE if either the propensity score model or the outcome model is correct. In addition, the proposed estimator is locally semiparametric efficient when both models are correctly specified. To further relax the parametric assumptions, we extend our method by using a sieve estimation approach. We show that the resulting estimator is globally efficient under a set of much weaker assumptions and has a smaller asymptotic bias than the existing estimators. Finally, we evaluate the finite sample performance of the proposed estimators via simulation and empirical studies. An open-source software package is available for implementing the proposed methods.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文