跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用非线性与生存预测的评价指标,并采用医学数据示例,未涉及宏观预测或金融收益预测。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Gang Li
Xiaoyan Wang

非线性模型与右删失事件时间数据的预测准确度量

研究问题
对于非线性预测函数及右删失事件时间数据,如何分别衡量潜在预测能力和预测校正需求,而不只报告单一拟合指标?
方法与思路
作者从总体方差与预测误差分解出发,构造基于校正预测函数的两个解释比例指标,并推导无删失与有删失的样本版本。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称两指标分别衡量潜在预测力和可通过校正减少的误差,样本指标具有一致性;无删失最小二乘线性模型下分别退化为 R² 和一。
阅读关注点
应核对线性校正的定义、两个指标的区别、右删失样本版本所需条件,以及指标估计是否充分考虑预测函数本身的估计误差。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;删失条件、指标估计细节和有限样本结果未说明,不能据此判断任意预测模型的准确度。

原文摘要

This article develops a pair of new prediction summary measures for a nonlinear prediction function with right-censored time-to-event data. The first measure, defined as the proportion of explained variance by a linearly corrected prediction function, quantifies the potential predictive power of the nonlinear prediction function. The second measure, defined as the proportion of explained prediction error by its corrected prediction function, gauges the closeness of the prediction function to its corrected version and serves as a supplementary measure to indicate (by a value less than 1) whether the correction is needed to fulfill its potential predictive power and quantify how much prediction error reduction can be realized with the correction. The two measures together provide a complete summary of the predictive accuracy of the nonlinear prediction function. We motivate these measures by first establishing a variance decomposition and a prediction error decomposition at the population level and then deriving uncensored and censored sample versions of these decompositions. We note that for the least square prediction function under the linear model with no censoring, the first measure reduces to the classical coefficient of determination and the second measure degenerates to 1. We show that the sample measures are consistent estimators of their population counterparts and conduct extensive simulations to investigate their finite sample properties. A real data illustration is provided using the PBC data. Supplementary materials for this article are available online. An R package PAmeasures has been developed and made available via the CRAN R library. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文