跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕时间序列斜率成分、趋势检验与序列相关展开,直接属于时间序列分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Fabio Busetti
Andrew Harvey

趋势检验

研究问题
如何判断时间序列是否需要斜率成分,并区分确定性斜率与随机非平稳斜率,以及序列相关会如何影响检验?
方法与思路
作者分析一阶差分均值的t检验,采用参数或非参数方式处理序列相关,并以局部功效分析和模拟比较相关检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该t检验对两类斜率备择均有较高功效;另指出以随机斜率为原假设的检验可能难以拒绝较小确定性斜率。
阅读关注点
应核对各检验的原假设、序列相关修正及参数模型设定,并区分通常t统计量与按样本量平方根标准化后的用途。
阅读边界
仅依据所给出版社摘要;“较好选择”是作者在所考察情形下的判断,具体条件与功效数值未说明,不能作普遍推荐。

原文摘要

The paper examines various tests for assessing whether a time series model requires a slope component. We first consider the simple t-test on the mean of first differences and show that it achieves high power against the alternative hypothesis of a stochastic nonstationary slope and also against a purely deterministic slope. The test may be modified, parametrically or nonparametrically, to deal with serial correlation. Using both local limiting power arguments and finite-sample Monte Carlo results, we compare the t-test with the nonparametric tests of Vogelsang (1998, Econometrica 66, 123–148) and with a modified stationarity test. Overall the t-test seems a good choice, particularly if it is implemented by fitting a parametric model to the data. When standardized by the square root of the sample size, the simple t-statistic, with no correction for serial correlation, has a limiting distribution if the slope is stochastic. We investigate whether it is a viable test for the null hypothesis of a stochastic slope and conclude that its value may be limited by an inability to reject a small deterministic slope.The second author thanks the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) for support as part of a project on Dynamic Common Factor Models for Regional Time Series, grant L138 25 1008. Support from the Bank of Italy is also gratefully acknowledged. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the meeting on Frontiers in Time Series held in Olbia, Italy, in June 2005 and at the NSF/NBER Time Series conference in Heidelberg, Germany, in September 2005; we are grateful to several participants for helpful comments. We also thank Peter Phillips, Robert Taylor, Jesus Gonzalo, and a number of other participants at the Unit Root and Co-integration Testing meeting in Faro, Portugal, for helpful comments. We are grateful to Paulo Rodrigues and two referees for their comments.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文