跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于通用隐私保护和非参数假设检验,未指向因果、面板、宏观或金融的具体模型,因此不指定给定领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ilmun Kim
Antonin Schrab

差分隐私置换检验

研究问题
如何把经典置换检验扩展到隐私保护场景,同时保持有限样本有效性,并控制不同隐私强度下检验功效的损失?
方法与思路
作者构造差分隐私置换检验框架,给出一致性与非渐近统一功效条件,并以核统计量实现两样本及独立性检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称框架兼具有限样本有效性和差分隐私,所提 dpMMD 与 dpHSIC 在不同隐私区间达到极小极大最优功效。
阅读关注点
应核对置换有效性所需的可交换性、隐私机制与统计量敏感度,以及功效条件、最优性所针对的备择类和隐私范围。
阅读边界
仅据稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;具体有效性与功效条件未提供,不能视为任意统计量均具有相同保证。

原文摘要

Recent years have witnessed growing concerns about the privacy of sensitive data. In response to these concerns, differential privacy has emerged as a rigorous framework for privacy protection, gaining widespread recognition in both academic and industrial domains. While substantial progress has been made in private data analysis, existing methods often suffer from impracticality or a significant loss of statistical efficiency. This article aims to alleviate these concerns in the context of hypothesis testing by introducing differentially private permutation tests. The proposed framework extends classical non-private permutation tests to private settings, maintaining both finite-sample validity and differential privacy in a rigorous manner. The power of the proposed test depends on the choice of a test statistic, and we establish general conditions for consistency and non-asymptotic uniform power. To demonstrate the utility and practicality of our framework, we focus on reproducing kernel-based test statistics and introduce differentially private kernel tests for two-sample and independence testing: dpMMD and dpHSIC. The proposed kernel tests are straightforward to implement, applicable to various types of data, and attain minimax optimal power across different privacy regimes. Our empirical evaluations further highlight their competitive power under various synthetic and real-world scenarios, emphasizing their practical value. The code is publicly available to facilitate the implementation of our framework. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文