跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究回归函数的平均斜率与机器学习估计,未明确给出因果识别或其他所列细分方向的依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Harvey Klyne
Rajen D. Shah

利用双重机器学习估计平均偏效应

研究问题
在回归函数可能高度非线性时,如何估计具有解释性的平均偏效应,并降低条件均值导数和条件得分估计的困难?
方法与思路
作者对机器学习初步回归估计进行再平滑,并用位置—尺度模型描述目标预测变量的条件分布,以简化条件得分估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称条件得分误差可由均值、标准差及一维得分估计误差控制,并给出Lipschitz得分函数次高斯性的新结果。
阅读关注点
应核对再平滑的偏差控制、位置—尺度假设和初步估计的收敛要求,以及模型误设下数值表现对应哪些理论保证。
阅读边界
依据OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未说明完整推断条件,平均偏效应的回归解释也不能自动视为因果效应。

原文摘要

Single-parameter summaries of variable effects in regression settings are desirable for ease of interpretation. However, (partially) linear models, for example, which would deliver these, may fit poorly to the data. On the other hand, an interpretable summary of the contribution of a given predictor is provided by the so-called average partial effect—the average slope of the regression function with respect to the predictor of interest. Although one can construct a doubly robust procedure for estimating this quantity, it entails estimating the derivative of the conditional mean and also the conditional score of the predictor of interest given all others, tasks which can be very challenging in moderate dimensions: in particular, popular decision tree based regression methods cannot be used. In this work, we introduce an approach for estimating the average partial effect whose accuracy depends primarily on the estimation of certain regression functions, which may be performed by user-chosen machine learning methods that produce potentially nondifferentiable estimates. Our procedure involves resmoothing a given first-stage regression estimator to produce a differentiable version, and modelling the conditional distribution of the predictor of interest through a location–scale model. We show that with the latter assumption, surprisingly the overall error in estimating the conditional score is controlled by a sum of errors of estimating the conditional mean and conditional standard deviation, and the estimation error in a much more tractable univariate score estimation problem. Our theory makes use of a new result on the sub-Gaussianity of Lipschitz score functions that may be of independent interest. We demonstrate the attractive numerical performance of our approach in a variety of settings including ones with misspecification. An R package drape implementing the methodology is available on CRAN.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文