Estimation with Selected Binomial Information or do you Really Believe that Dave Winfield is Batting .471?
基于选择性二项信息的估计:如何解读被挑选的击球率AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要处理伯努利信息的选择性呈现与能力估计,未涉及处理效应识别或所列其他细分方向。
基于选择性二项信息的估计:如何解读被挑选的击球率AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Often sports announcers, particularly in baseball, provide the listener with exaggerated information concerning a player's performance. For example, we may be told that Dave Winfield, a popular baseball player, has hit safely in 8 of his last 17 chances (a batting average of .471). This is biased, or selected information, as the “17” was chosen to maximize the reported percentage. We model this as observing a maximum success rate of a Bernoulli process and show how to construct the likelihood function for a player's true batting ability. The likelihood function is a high-degree polynomial, but it can be computed exactly. Alternatively, the problem yields to solutions based on either the EM algorithm or Gibbs sampling. Using these techniques, we compute maximum likelihood estimators, Bayes estimators, and associated measures of error. We also show how to approximate the likelihood using a Brownian motion calculation. We find that although constructing good estimators from selected information is difficult, we seem to be able to estimate better than expected, particularly when using prior information. The estimators are illustrated with data from the 1992 Major League Baseball season.