跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要处理伯努利信息的选择性呈现与能力估计,未涉及处理效应识别或所列其他细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
George Casella
Roger L. Berger

基于选择性二项信息的估计:如何解读被挑选的击球率

研究问题
当报道者挑选使近期成功率最高的观察窗口时,如何利用这种选择性信息估计球员真实能力及其不确定性?
方法与思路
作者把报道建模为伯努利过程中的最大成功率,构造可精确计算的似然,并讨论 EM、Gibbs 抽样及布朗运动近似。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称可据此计算最大似然与贝叶斯估计及误差度量;棒球实例显示选择性信息仍有估计价值,尤其结合先验时。
阅读关注点
应核对允许选择的窗口范围、选择规则是否已知、似然构造及近似误差,并检查先验如何影响能力估计与误差评估。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;选择机制的完整条件与估计效果未详述,不能推广到任意选择性报道。

原文摘要

Often sports announcers, particularly in baseball, provide the listener with exaggerated information concerning a player's performance. For example, we may be told that Dave Winfield, a popular baseball player, has hit safely in 8 of his last 17 chances (a batting average of .471). This is biased, or selected information, as the “17” was chosen to maximize the reported percentage. We model this as observing a maximum success rate of a Bernoulli process and show how to construct the likelihood function for a player's true batting ability. The likelihood function is a high-degree polynomial, but it can be computed exactly. Alternatively, the problem yields to solutions based on either the EM algorithm or Gibbs sampling. Using these techniques, we compute maximum likelihood estimators, Bayes estimators, and associated measures of error. We also show how to approximate the likelihood using a Brownian motion calculation. We find that although constructing good estimators from selected information is difficult, we seem to be able to estimate better than expected, particularly when using prior information. The estimators are illustrated with data from the 1992 Major League Baseball season.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文