跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究医疗分类器的预测表现评估,未涉及宏观预测或金融收益预测。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Tianxi Cai

高效评估模型预测表现的半监督方法

研究问题
当结局标注昂贵而预测变量易于获取时,如何结合少量有标签与大量无标签数据,更有效地评估二元分类器的预测表现?
方法与思路
作者先用有标签数据非参数校准条件风险,再结合无标签数据估计预测准确性指标,并用交叉验证和扰动重抽样处理推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称估计量具有一致性和渐近正态性,且模型正确设定时渐近方差小于监督式对应量,并给出模拟与病历应用。
阅读关注点
应核对标注样本与总体的关系、模型正确设定的含义,以及各准确性指标的校准、过拟合修正和重抽样条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,未列具体正则条件或有限样本结果;方差优势以正确设定为前提,不能据此断言模型误设时仍然成立。

原文摘要

Summary In many modern machine learning applications, the outcome is expensive or time consuming to collect whereas the predictor information is easy to obtain. Semi-supervised (SS) learning aims at utilizing large amounts of ‘unlabelled’ data along with small amounts of ‘labelled’ data to improve the efficiency of a classical supervised approach. Though numerous SS learning classification and prediction procedures have been proposed in recent years, no methods currently exist to evaluate the prediction performance of a working regression model. In the context of developing phenotyping algorithms derived from electronic medical records, we present an efficient two-step estimation procedure for evaluating a binary classifier based on various prediction performance measures in the SS setting. In step I, the labelled data are used to obtain a non-parametrically calibrated estimate of the conditional risk function. In step II, SS estimates of the prediction accuracy parameters are constructed based on the estimated conditional risk function and the unlabelled data. We demonstrate that, under mild regularity conditions, the estimators proposed are consistent and asymptotically normal. Importantly, the asymptotic variance of the SS estimators is always smaller than that of the supervised counterparts under correct model specification. We also correct for potential overfitting bias in the SS estimators in finite samples with cross-validation and we develop a perturbation resampling procedure to approximate their distributions. Our proposals are evaluated through extensive simulation studies and illustrated with two real electronic medical record studies aiming to develop phenotyping algorithms for rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis.

笔记与分组