跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究含潜在因子的面板残差横截面独立性检验,并强调网络型备择和空间误差依赖,支持面板数据与网络方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
M. Hashem Pesaran
Yimeng Xie

如何检测潜在因子模型中的网络依赖?偏误修正 CD 检验

研究问题
从含潜在因子的面板残差检验横截面依赖时,如何避免标准 CD 检验的过度拒绝,并识别剔除共同因子后仍存在的网络型依赖?
方法与思路
作者分析弱因子下标准 CD 检验的有效性,提出偏误修正的 CD*,覆盖纯因子模型、含因子的面板回归及误差序列相关情形。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称 CD* 在误差横截面独立的原假设下渐近标准正态,对网络型备择有功效;美国377个都市区房价应用仍检出空间误差依赖。
阅读关注点
应核对因子强弱的界定、偏误修正项和因子估计的关系、序列相关时的处理,以及网络备择功效和房价应用的模型设定。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 Crossref 摘要;渐近条件、网络结构与模拟数值未说明,检出残余依赖不能识别具体网络机制,也不推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

In a recent paper, Juodis and Reese (2022, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics , 40, 1191–1203) (JR) show that the application of the CD test proposed by Pesaran (2004, General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels , CWPE 0435, Cambridge) to residuals from panels with latent factors results in over-rejection. They propose a randomized test statistic to correct for over-rejection, and add a screening component to achieve power. This article considers the same problem but from a different perspective and shows that the standard CD test remains valid if the latent factors are weak. A bias-corrected version, CD $^{\ast}$ , is proposed which is shown to be asymptotically standard normal under the null of error cross-sectional independence which has power against network-type alternatives. This result is shown to hold for pure latent factor models as well as for panel regression models with latent factors. The case where the errors are serially correlated is also considered. Small sample properties of the CD $^{\ast}$ test are investigated by Monte Carlo experiments and are shown to have satisfactory small sample properties. In an empirical application, using the CD $^{\ast}$ test, it is shown that there remains spatial error dependence in a panel data model for real house price changes across 377 Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the United States, even after the effects of latent factors are filtered out.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文