Learning a tree-structured Ising model in order to make predictions
面向预测的树结构 Ising 模型学习AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及统计图模型与一般条件预测,未涉及经济网络干扰或宏观金融预测对象。
反馈分类问题面向预测的树结构 Ising 模型学习AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We study the problem of learning a tree Ising model from samples such that subsequent predictions made using the model are accurate. The prediction task considered in this paper is that of predicting the values of a subset of variables given values of some other subset of variables. Virtually all previous work on graphical model learning has focused on recovering the true underlying graph. We define a distance (“small set TV” or ssTV) between distributions $P$ and $Q$ by taking the maximum, over all subsets $\mathcal{S}$ of a given size, of the total variation between the marginals of $P$ and $Q$ on $\mathcal{S}$; this distance captures the accuracy of the prediction task of interest. We derive nonasymptotic bounds on the number of samples needed to get a distribution (from the same class) with small ssTV relative to the one generating the samples. One of the main messages of this paper is that far fewer samples are needed than for recovering the underlying tree, which means that accurate predictions are possible using the wrong tree.