跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦磁共振图像噪声回归与诊断,未明确涉及所列计量经济学细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Hongtu Zhu
Yimei Li
Joseph G. Ibrahim
Xiaoyan Shi
Hongyu An
Yashen Chen
Wei Gao
Weili Lin
Daniel B. Rowe

识别磁共振图像噪声来源的回归模型

研究问题
如何刻画不同磁共振成像模式中的随机噪声,并借助回归诊断区分模型失配、运动伪影及其他影响图像测量的噪声成分?
方法与思路
作者提出 Rician 回归及两个相关正态模型,开发最大似然估计算法,并结合拟合优度、影响度量与图形工具开展诊断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,诊断方法能够检查模型关键假设、定位异常观测,并在真实图像中通过未被模型解释的体素内变异发现细微伪影。
阅读关注点
阅读时应核对三个模型适用的成像情境、诊断统计量的校准方式,以及异常位置与具体噪声来源之间是否存在可验证的对应关系。
阅读边界
材料为稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;摘要未给出估计算法细节、诊断误报率或模拟数值,不能判断各类伪影的普遍识别能力。

原文摘要

Stochastic noise, susceptibility artifacts, magnetic field and radiofrequency inhomogeneities, and other noise components in magnetic resonance images (MRIs) can introduce serious bias into any measurements made with those images. We formally introduce three regression models including a Rician regression model and two associated normal models to characterize stochastic noise in various magnetic resonance imaging modalities, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and functional MRI (fMRI). Estimation algorithms are introduced to maximize the likelihood function of the three regression models. We also develop a diagnostic procedure for systematically exploring MR images to identify noise components other than simple stochastic noise, and to detect discrepancies between the fitted regression models and MRI data. The diagnostic procedure includes goodness-of-fit statistics, measures of influence, and tools for graphical display. The goodness-of-fit statistics can assess the key assumptions of the three regression models, whereas measures of influence can isolate outliers caused by certain noise components, including motion artifacts. The tools for graphical display permit graphical visualization of the values for the goodness-of-fit statistic and influence measures. Finally, we conduct simulation studies to evaluate performance of these methods, and we analyze a real dataset to illustrate how our diagnostic procedure localizes subtle image artifacts by detecting intravoxel variability that is not captured by the regression models.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文