Bayesian Random-Effects Meta-Analysis Integrating Individual Participant Data and Aggregate Data
整合个体数据与汇总数据的贝叶斯随机效应元分析AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦数据整合与随机效应元分析,未明确因果识别、面板结构或其他所列细分方法。
整合个体数据与汇总数据的贝叶斯随机效应元分析AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Meta-analysis using individual participant data (IPD) offers many benefits, including greater analytical flexibility, compared to conventional analyses based on aggregate data (AD). However, it is often hindered by restricted access to IPD. Relying solely on available IPD may introduce “data availability bias,” compromising external validity. Integrating IPD with relevant AD addresses this concern, but existing methods are restrictive, requiring precise knowledge of the IPD-to-AD parameter mapping or relying on fixed-effect models that fail to account for study-level heterogeneity. We propose a Bayesian random-effects framework to overcome these limitations. Building on existing methods, we use estimating equations to derive the conditional distributions of AD parameters, given the corresponding IPD model parameters. We then apply the multiplier bootstrap method and density ratio models to approximate these conditional distributions based on the observed data, without requiring homogeneity in the covariate distributions. Both theoretical and empirical results demonstrate that our method reduces mean squared error compared to IPD-only analysis when IPD availability is independent of the data, and reduces bias when data availability is dependent. We apply this integrated approach to complement the IPD-only analysis in the International Weight Management in Pregnancy (i-WIP) Collaborative Group study.