跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究抽样微观数据的隐私披露风险,未涉及给定的计量领域细分或金融尾部风险。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
C. J. Skinner
M. J. Elliot

微观数据的一种披露风险度量

研究问题
统计机构发布抽样微观数据时,如何衡量记录与总体个体唯一匹配的正确概率,并利用样本评估这一披露风险?
方法与思路
作者以唯一匹配正确的概率定义风险,构造点预测量与方差估计量,讨论部分复杂抽样扩展,并用英国人口普查数据考察。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,新风险度量在指定意义下可由样本一致推断,且无需强建模假设;点预测与方差估计的理论性质得到数值考察支持。
阅读关注点
应核对唯一匹配事件、指定一致性含义与抽样机制,理解与两种既有度量的差异,并检查复杂抽样扩展范围。
阅读边界
仅据 Crossref 摘要,无法判断所需假设及复杂抽样适用范围;披露风险是数据隐私问题,不能解释为金融风险。

原文摘要

Summary Protection against disclosure is important for statistical agencies releasing microdata files from sample surveys. Simple measures of disclosure risk can provide useful evidence to support decisions about release. We propose a new measure of disclosure risk: the probability that a unique match between a microdata record and a population unit is correct. We argue that this measure has at least two advantages. First, we suggest that it may be a more realistic measure of risk than two measures that are currently used with census data. Second, we show that consistent inference (in a specified sense) may be made about this measure from sample data without strong modelling assumptions. This is a surprising finding, in its contrast with the properties of the two ‘similar’ established measures. As a result, this measure has potentially useful applications to sample surveys. In addition to obtaining a simple consistent predictor of the measure, we propose a simple variance estimator and show that it is consistent. We also consider the extension of inference to allow for certain complex sampling schemes. We present a numerical study based on 1991 census data for about 450 000 enumerated individuals in one area of Great Britain. We show that the theoretical results on the properties of the point predictor of the measure of risk and its variance estimator hold to a good approximation for these data.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文