跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论宏观面板中的未知共同因子及 CCE 估计与推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ignace De Vos
Ovidijus Stauskas

一般未知因子下共同相关效应回归的横截面自助法

研究问题
当宏观面板包含平稳与非平稳的未知共同因子,且时间维度与横截面维度之比不趋于零时,如何修正合并 CCE 估计的偏差并进行有效推断?
方法与思路
作者采用横截面自助法,在样本两维共同增长且 T/N 趋于有限值的框架下逼近 CCE 估计量分布,并据此构造偏差修正与置信区间。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该自助法可容纳一般未知因子,拓宽合并 CCE 的有效推断范围;另讨论个体扰动非平稳的情况,并提供模拟与贸易引力应用。
阅读关注点
应核对自助抽样单位、横截面依赖与因子条件,以及个体扰动非平稳时的适用范围;还需查看偏差修正和置信区间的具体构造。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 版本摘要,不能判断完整正则条件、证明或有限样本优势的范围,也不能推断后续刊本变化;比较优越性属于摘要陈述。

原文摘要

The Common Correlated Effects (CCE) approach enjoys considerable popularity for estimating factor-augmented panel data models. A key benefit is that by orthogonalizing the data on the available cross-section averages, the unobserved components are eliminated from the data, regardless of their order(s) of integration. This obviates the need for such knowledge, and makes CCE particularly attractive for macroeconomic applications, where the set of unobservables might contain both stationary and non-stationary variables. Despite of these benefits, it is often neglected that the pooled CCE (CCEP) estimator suffers from an asymptotic bias in TN−1→τ>0 panels, which too is common in macroeconomic research. This bias is highly disruptive for inference but cannot generally be remedied with analytical corrections. As such, we establish in this paper the validity of the cross-section bootstrap under general unknown factors for TN−1→τ<∞ as (N,T)→∞. We show that the scheme replicates the distribution of the CCE estimators, leading to a straightforward bias-correction, and confidence intervals that enable asymptotically valid inference for τ<∞. This significantly broadens the applicability of the CCEP method. We in addition explore the case where idiosyncratics serve as another source of non-stationarity. Simulation experiments show that our theoretical predictions translate well to finite samples, and that the methodology outperforms alternative bias-corrections and estimators. The method is finally demonstrated with a gravity trade application based on the dataset of Serlenga and Shin (2007).

笔记与分组
相关领域论文