跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论临床自适应检验的概率基础,未明确涉及所列经济计量领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
W. Brannath
G. Gutjahr
P. Bauer

验证性自适应设计的概率基础

研究问题
当验证性试验允许研究者依据前期数据改变设计、且适应规则未预先完整指定时,如何建立保证第一类错误控制的概率框架?
方法与思路
作者以给定第一阶段数据后的第二阶段条件分布可由回归模型描述为前提,分析条件第一类错误率和条件不变性原则。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在该回归模型前提下,两项原则可控制第一类错误,并可将任意自适应设计的事件嵌入正式概率空间。
阅读关注点
应核对回归模型前提的精确定义、独立于协变量分布的可识别性要求,以及不限制适应规则这一结论的适用范围。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;形式化条件和证明未提供,不能将不限制适应规则理解为无需任何模型假设。

原文摘要

Adaptive designs allow the investigator of a confirmatory trial to react to unforeseen developments by changing the design. This broad flexibility comes at the price of a complex statistical model where important components, such as the adaptation rule, remain unspecified. It has thus been doubted whether Type I error control can be guaranteed in general adaptive designs. This criticism is fully justified as long as the probabilistic framework on which an adaptive design is based remains vague and implicit. Therefore, an indispensable step lies in the clarification of the probabilistic fundamentals of adaptive testing. We demonstrate that the two main principles of adaptive designs, namely the conditional Type I error rate and the conditional invariance principle, will provide Type I error rate control, if the conditional distribution of the second-stage data, given the first-stage data, can be described in terms of a regression model. A similar assumption is required for regression analysis where the distribution of the covariates is a nuisance parameter and the model needs to be identifiable independently from the covariate distribution. We further show that under the assumption of a regression model, the events of an arbitrary adaptive design can be embedded into a formal probability space without the need of posing any restrictions on the adaptation rule. As a consequence of our results, artificial constraints that had to be imposed on the investigator only for mathematical tractability of the model are no longer necessary.

笔记与分组