Semiparametric Efficient Empirical Higher Order Influence Function Estimators
半参数有效的经验高阶影响函数估计量AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确将方法扩展至协变量足以控制混杂时的平均处理效应估计。
半参数有效的经验高阶影响函数估计量AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Robins et al. (2008, 2017) applied the theory of higher order influence functions (HOIFs) to derive an estimator of the mean $ψ$ of an outcome Y in a missing data model with Y missing at random conditional on a vector X of continuous covariates; their estimator, in contrast to previous estimators, is semiparametric efficient under the minimal conditions of Robins et al. (2009b), together with an additional (non-minimal) smoothness condition on the density g of X, because the Robins et al. (2008, 2017) estimator depends on a nonparametric estimate of g. In this paper, we introduce a new HOIF estimator that has the same asymptotic properties as the original one, but does not impose any smoothness requirement on g. This is important for two reasons. First, one rarely has the knowledge about the properties of g. Second, even when g is smooth, if the dimension of X is even moderate, accurate nonparametric estimation of its density is not feasible at the sample sizes often encountered in applications. In fact, to the best of our knowledge, this new HOIF estimator remains the only semiparametric efficient estimator of $ψ$ under minimal conditions, despite the rapidly growing literature on causal effect estimation. We also show that our estimator can be generalized to the entire class of functionals considered by Robins et al. (2008) which include the average effect of a treatment on a response Y when a vector X suffices to control confounding and the expected conditional variance of a response Y given a vector X. Simulation experiments are also conducted, which demonstrate that our new estimator outperforms those of Robins et al. (2008, 2017) in finite samples, when g is not very smooth.