跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用确定性模拟模型的贝叶斯推断,没有足够文本依据归入所给经济计量细分领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
David Poole
Adrian E. Raftery

确定性模拟模型的推断:贝叶斯融合方法

研究问题
对具有众多用户指定输入的确定性模拟模型,如何同时利用输入与输出的信息和不确定性,并避免推断依赖参数化方式?
方法与思路
作者提出贝叶斯融合,将隐含先验与显式先验通过对数汇聚结合,以汇聚后的输入先验开展推断,并用 SIR 算法模拟后验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法避免贝叶斯综合中的 Borel 悖论,并从可逆模型扩展至不可逆模型;所述模拟中均方误差低于较简单的贝叶斯方法。
阅读关注点
应核对先验汇聚的定义与权重、不可逆映射的处理、避免参数化依赖的论证,以及模拟比较中的基准和设定。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要解读。摘要未说明汇聚权重、完整条件或误差改善幅度,所述比较不能推广至所有模拟模型。

原文摘要

Deterministic simulation models are used in many areas of science, engineering, and policy making. Typically, these are complex models that attempt to capture underlying mechanisms in considerable detail, and they have many user-specified inputs. The inputs are often specified by some form of trial-and-error approach in which plausible values are postulated, the corresponding outputs inspected, and the inputs modified until plausible outputs are obtained. Here we address the issue of more formal inference for such models. A probabilistic approach, called Bayesian synthesis, was shown to suffer from the Borel paradox, according to which the results can depend on the parameterization of the model. We propose a modified approach, called Bayesian melding which takes into full account information and uncertainty about both inputs and outputs to the model, while avoiding the Borel paradox. This is done by recognizing the existence of two priors, one implicit and one explicit, on each input and output; these are combined via logarithmic pooling. Bayesian melding is then standard Bayesian inference with the pooled prior on inputs, and is implemented here by posterior simulation using the sampling-importance-resampling (SIR) algorithm. We develop this initially for invertible models, and then extend it to the more difficult and more common case of noninvertible models. We illustrate the methodology using a number of examples. Simulation studies show that the method outperforms a simpler Bayesian approach in terms of mean squared error. A number of open research problems are discussed.

笔记与分组